On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> Since there was no feedback on this, I investigated a little further and I >> noticed that several existing ARM cores already do it this way (arm926ejs, >> arm926ejs, arm920t, etc) so I think there's then a nice prejudice to continue >> on this path.
> yes that's the correct idea > > I've some old patch that start to do it if you are interrested to continue > on it If you post it (or point me to where I can find it) I can at least get a grip of what you're suggesting and then see what I can do. My actual plan is to help get the colibri-pxa270 stuff merged in, but it seems we should fix some duplication first to make way for that. >> But only one of these are PXA270 based, and I'm not fluent enough in the PXA >> world to tell how much that can be re-used between PXA models or similar. > for the pxa2xx I can help you, for the pxa3xx I've no board I'll very soon not have any PXA board at all... :-) I was mostly (at this point) thinking about the knowledge about how they differ and similar. I mean, does it make sense to try to make a single lowlevel_init.S for all PXAXXX models or one for each PXA2xx/PXA3xx or do we need PXA25x/PXA27X/PXA3xx etc... But I guess your initial patch might reveal that to me? -- / daniel.haxx.se _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
