Hi, Piotr. On 01/27/2014 11:15 PM, Piotr Wilczek wrote: > This patch adds api to decode peripheral id based in interrupt number. > > Signed-off-by: Piotr Wilczek <p.wilc...@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com> > CC: Minkyu Kang <mk7.k...@samsung.com> > --- > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c > index 904177a..3201d53 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/pinmux.c > @@ -741,6 +741,25 @@ int exynos_pinmux_config(int peripheral, int flags) > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > +
Remove the white space. > +static int exynos4_pinmux_decode_periph_id(const void *blob, int node) > +{ > + int err; > + u32 cell[3]; > + > + err = fdtdec_get_int_array(blob, node, "interrupts", cell, > + ARRAY_SIZE(cell)); > + if (err) > + return PERIPH_ID_NONE; > + > + /* check for invalid peripheral id */ > + if ((PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4 > cell[1]) || (cell[1] < PERIPH_ID_UART0)) What's condition checking? i didn't understand this. PERIPH_ID_SDMMC > cell[1] or PERIPH_ID_UART0 > cell[1] is valid? Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > + return cell[1]; > + > + debug(" invalid peripheral id\n"); > + return PERIPH_ID_NONE; > +} > + > static int exynos5_pinmux_decode_periph_id(const void *blob, int node) > { > int err; > @@ -763,6 +782,8 @@ int pinmux_decode_periph_id(const void *blob, int node) > { > if (cpu_is_exynos5()) > return exynos5_pinmux_decode_periph_id(blob, node); > + else if (cpu_is_exynos4()) > + return exynos4_pinmux_decode_periph_id(blob, node); > else > return PERIPH_ID_NONE; > } > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot