On 01/21/2014 09:29 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 10:14 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear York, >> >> In message <f1d691e4-180a-4a2d-be07-812547d46...@freescale.com> you wrote: >>> >>>> On second thought, I also think we should avoid solutions where the >>>> BE/LE test has to be done for each and every I/O accessor call again >>>> and again. We should rather do this just once, and for example set >>>> function pointers as needed (hoping that this driver will only be >>>> needed after relocation, so we have writable data segment). >>> >>> I like the idea of setting it just once, but I don't see how to >>> implement it. A pointer is probably not the solution, because we do need >>> some drivers before relocation. >> >> "some drivers before relocation" - how many which are these?
IFC, DDR, I2C (only 32-bit controller is concerned), GUT >> >> Also, is it really necessary to make the decision about endianess at >> runtime? We don't have multi-board support in U-Boot yet, so when you >> build an image you know exactly which SoC you are building for, so you >> should be able to make the selection at compile time? > > It is done at compile time in this patch. > No. It is not necessary to do it at run time. It would be easier to use a switch to decide at compiling time. It does involve many changes to implement the wrapper. York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
