On 14/01/14 22:12, Tom Rini wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/13/2014 05:31 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> Hi Tom >> >>> Hey all, >>> >>> I've put v2014.01-rc3 out and we should have a tarball soon. >>> >>> Here's where we're at, I feel. We got some big changes in, which >>> had been due for a while, on Friday. I don't think it's a good >>> idea to release today, so I'm going to push things out a week. >>> >>> Here's what I expect for the release, change-wise: - Any >>> regressions people report - Either removal of mini2440 and mx1ads >>> or CONFIG_SYS_HZ fixes for them (Albert is working a removal >>> patch now, or soon). - Fixes for i.mx platforms using hardfp >>> toolchains (which means do_div being called instead). The patch >>> exists, lets get this through please. >>> >> >> We have some fixes for Samsung's Trats and Trats2. >> >> Some of them had already been sent do mailing list (as explicit >> fixes for v2014.01) >> >> I've also prepared some tweaks for envs on those boards. Shall I >> sent them directly to you or ask Minkyu to pull them to >> u-boot-samsung? > > Well, Minkyu, can you get a pull request together for Albert today or > tomorrow at the latest? Thanks! >
It seems there are three patches. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/310477/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/310478/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/310479/ for reducing PR steps, it's better to apply those patches to u-boot-arm or u-boot directly. How you think? Thanks, Minkyu Kang. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
