Hi Tom, On 3 December 2013 14:54, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:47:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> On 3 December 2013 14:34, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:24:40PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Tom, >> >> >> >> On 2 December 2013 13:27, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >> > +Tom >> >> > >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > On 2 December 2013 12:02, Mateusz Zalega <m.zal...@samsung.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 11/29/13 02:00, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> >> >>> How come 13/13 is missing? >> >> >> >> >> >> It's not. >> >> > >> >> > I think it was missing until someone approved it, since it was over >> >> > the 100KB limit. >> >> >> >> What do you think of this series? Do you think it is ready to apply? >> > >> > I think we're where it needs wider testing now, yes. But given that >> > we've stumbled onto another problem or two with the bootm refactoring >> > series, I'm really hesitant to pull something else big in for this >> > release. Kbuild style Makefiles this time, start DM for v2014.04 is my >> > plan currently. >> >> Sounds reasonable. It's ready to go, hopefully won't need a lot of >> care and feeding before then. >> >> Re bootm I am still not thrilled with the outcome. We flushed out >> quite a few cases in dark corners at great expense, but don't have a >> lot of automated tests (only the vboot test actually runs bootm I >> think). Any ideas on what we should do here? > > Well, did you see where Michal's test case was? It looks like that > should fail anywhere, not just microblaze. For now, I really just want > to get this latest bug fixed.
OK I see it, will take a look. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
