Dear Paul Burton, > On 11/11/13 13:33, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Paul Burton, > > > >> On 10/11/13 20:09, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> Dear Paul Burton, > >>> > >>>> Without setting up the PIRQ[A:D] interrupt routes, PCI interrupts will > >>>> be left disabled. Linux does not set up this routing but relies upon > >>>> it having been set up by the bootloader, reading back the IRQ lines > >>>> which the PIRQ[A:D] signals have been routed to. > >>> > >>> Did you also submit a fix to Linux guys? > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Marek Vasut > >> > >> No, I haven't. Although Linux is reliant upon these values having been > >> programmed it's quite clear from reading its code that that depence is > >> intentional. It explicitely reads the route setup by the bootloader > >> rather than clobbering it, and to me that does make sense in this case. > > > > Can this setup not be passed via a well-designed DT binding then? > > I'm sure the information could be passed via DT but the Malta board > currently doesn't use DT at all either in Linux or U-boot, and I don't > have the time right now to convert them both to DT.
That's unfortunate, but OK. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
