Hi Wolfgang, > Dear Lukasz, > > In message <20131031182541.3a3020c6@amdc308.digital.local> you wrote: > > > > As a follow up from u-boot's mini-summit at ELCE 2013, I would like > > to once again share the new format of dfu_alt_info env variable > > (for those who couldn't attend). > > > > dfu_alt_info_cleanup: > > > > |---+-------------+-------------+---------+----------------------| > > | | <dev_name>: | <alt_name>, | <type> | extra > > params | > > |---+-------------+-------------+---------+----------------------| > > | 1 | mmc0: | rootfs, | part; | - | > > | 2 | mmc0: | uImage, | file, | part, dir; | > > | 3 | nand0: | u-boot.bin, | raw, | start, size; | > > | 4 | mmc0: | u-boot.bin, | raw, | start_lba, size_lba; | > > | 5 | ram0: | uImage, | ram, | start, size; | > > | 6 | ubi0: | kernel0, | raw; | - | > > |---+-------------+-------------+---------+----------------------| > > | 7 | cmd: | cmd, | cmd; | - | > > Why can we not have a common format for all media supporting the "raw" > type? I mean, why can we not also use "start, size" for mmc? It > should be trivial to convert into a LBA number.
I think, that I could do better with this table. What I have meant, is that the "raw" extra parameters are the same in both cases. The interpretation of start and size (if they are LBA or "normal" addresses) depends on the <dev_name>. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > Best regards, Lukasz Majewski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot