Am 30.10.2013 11:39, schrieb Andreas Bießmann: > Hi Bo, > > +Jens, he did the rewrite of the at91 gpio driver. >
> > I think this is a job for gpio_is_valid() then. How is this case handled > in kernel? > > Here are a few things to discuss. First of all I'd like to get some > insights why the at91 gpio API was changed back in 2010. It was a plain > number before and was changed to PORT + PIN as two separate parameters. > Jens, could you please shed some light on this? > Sorry, but I don't remember me why we do this. I think, it was a compromise between number of changes and code size. Regards Jens _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
