On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Masahiro Yamada <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com>wrote:
> Hello Simon. > > > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > > index 75e93c4..ba521e1 100644 > > > --- a/Makefile > > > +++ b/Makefile > > > @@ -248,17 +248,7 @@ endif > > > LIBS-$(CONFIG_OF_EMBED) += dts/libdts.o > > > LIBS-y += arch/$(ARCH)/lib/lib$(ARCH).o > > > LIBS-y += fs/libfs.o \ > > > - fs/cbfs/libcbfs.o \ > > > - fs/cramfs/libcramfs.o \ > > > - fs/ext4/libext4fs.o \ > > > - fs/fat/libfat.o \ > > > - fs/fdos/libfdos.o \ > > > - fs/jffs2/libjffs2.o \ > > > - fs/reiserfs/libreiserfs.o \ > > > - fs/sandbox/libsandboxfs.o \ > > > - fs/ubifs/libubifs.o \ > > > - fs/yaffs2/libyaffs2.o \ > > > - fs/zfs/libzfs.o > > > + fs/fat/libfat.o > > > > Why do you keep libfat here? > > > > Please see around line 88 of spl/Makefile > > LIBS-$(CONFIG_SPL_FAT_SUPPORT) += fs/fat/libfat.o > > > fs/fat/ is invoked also from spl/Makefile. > > > In order to move libfat, we need treak more. > Of course we can do this refactoring, > but it might be a little beyond the series > and I was afraid reviewers might be confused. > > That's why I decided to postpone to move libfat. > OK. Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > OK. I will post the follow-up patch > to move libfat. > > > > > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada > >
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
