On Saturday 18 April 2009 14:54:41 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message Mike wrote: > > > I've upload on the u-boot-arm tree in kconfig branch > > > some patch on which I work to all us to use Kconfig > > ... > > > i thought this was one of the points of u-boot-2 ? > > u-boot-v2 is an interesting approach in several aspects, but since it > was made publicly visible nearly two years ago it did not collect > much of a community around it. From my (strictly personal) point of > view, one show stopper is that there is no migration path - if you > want to go u-boot-v2, you have to throw away all what is in mainline. > And there is a lot of things that are not available in v2.
so, does it make sense to look at the feature set that v2 brings to the table and get it into u-boot v1 ? ive never personally looked at v2, but if it means i need to redo all of my Blackfin core/board code, that doesnt sound very appealing at all ... > So it does make perfect sense to me to add features like Kconfig > support to mainline. i'm not saying it doesnt make sense, just wanted to make sure i wasnt missing anything obvious. -mike _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
