On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:16:33 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> wrote:
> I don't think so. The switch from _end to __rel_dyn_end is done > precisely to avoid using a symbol for which an offset is needed (_end, > because linker-defined, can only have absolute relocations) and use > instead a compiler-defined, relocatable, symbol (__rel_dyn_end, compiled > from sections.c, always takes relative relocation) which does not need > an offset. This switch thus belongs in this patch. Actually, _end could be made a compiler-generated symbol too. This would be more consistent with what is done with the BSS and image start and end symbols, and would allow keeping _end here. Will revert change here and send v2 as a two-patch series as you suggest. > Amicalement, Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
