Dear Stephen, In message <52546f78.40...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote: > > > +Ideally, the license terms of all files in the source tree should be > > +defined by such License Identifiers; in no case a file can contain > > +more than one such License Identifier. > > I assume "one such License Identifier" here is intended to mean: a > source line prefixed with the words "SPDX-License-Identifier:". However, > to me "one such License Identifier" would actually refer to the > "GPL-2.0+" part of the line, since that's what actually identifies the > license. The other text simply introduces a list of license identifiers. > That would then conflict with the rest of the patch that goes on to > explicitly state that multiple licenses are allowed. > > In other words, I think that text can be confusing. I think you need to > add "line", "list" or "set" to the end of the sentence to make it > unambiguous.
Could you please suggest such a phrase? Thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Bus error -- driver executed. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
