Thanks Scott for taking time and reviewing the RFC patch.

Please find my reply in-lined.

On 09/17/2013 05:23 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 21:35 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
fsl_ifs_spl.c reads data from NAND and store at a memory location in raw mode.
It does not used MTD layer.
To read env variable from NAND MTD layer read/write required.

Hence, add mtd_block_isbad & nand_read_skip_bad function required during
env variable read.

Also, avoid nand_info during env read for SPL

Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabha...@freescale.com>
---
  common/env_nand.c              |    7 ++++---
  drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile      |    2 +-
  drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_spl.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/env_nand.c b/common/env_nand.c
index 7530962..7a7107f 100644
--- a/common/env_nand.c
+++ b/common/env_nand.c
@@ -246,11 +246,13 @@ int readenv(size_t offset, u_char *buf)
        u_char *char_ptr;
blocksize = nand_info[0].erasesize;
+#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
        if (!blocksize)
                return 1;
-
        len = min(blocksize, CONFIG_ENV_SIZE);
-
+#else
+       len = CONFIG_ENV_SIZE;
+#endif
Use positive logic (ifdef/else, not ifndef/else).

I will fix it.

Are you sure that CONFIG_ENV_SIZE will always be appropriate?  Shouldn't
you use CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE in place of nand_info[0].erasesize?

I can use CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE . but i can not use in SPL as its is defined as 128K.
@@ -396,7 +398,6 @@ void env_relocate_spec(void)
                return;
        }
  #endif
-
        ret = readenv(CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET, (u_char *)buf);
        if (ret) {
                set_default_env("!readenv() failed");
Remove unrelated whitespace changes.

Sure

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile
index 366dee6..06d5d14 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPL_NAND_LOAD) += nand_spl_load.o
  COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPL_NAND_ECC) += nand_ecc.o
  COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPL_NAND_BASE) += nand_base.o
  COBJS-$(CONFIG_SPL_NAND_INIT) += nand.o
+COBJS-$(CONFIG_NAND_FSL_IFC) += fsl_ifc_spl.o
No, it's still a minimal NAND driver (i.e. it doesn't use fsl_ifc.o).
Minimal NAND drivers are not related to minimal SPL init.

I will take care of it

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_spl.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_spl.c
index d462265..e7edacf 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_spl.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_spl.c
@@ -11,6 +11,28 @@
  #include <asm/io.h>
  #include <asm/fsl_ifc.h>
  #include <linux/mtd/nand.h>
+#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_INIT_MINIMAL
+#include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
+#endif
+
+static void nand_load(unsigned int offs, int uboot_size, uchar *dst);
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_INIT_MINIMAL
+struct mtd_info nand_info[CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE];
+
+int mtd_block_isbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
+{
+       return 0;
+}
+
+int nand_read_skip_bad(struct mtd_info *nand, loff_t offset, size_t *length,
+               size_t *actual, loff_t lim, u_char *buffer)
+{
+       nand_load(offset, *length, buffer);
+       return 0;
+}
+#endif
What does this have to do with minimal init?
This has nothing to do with minimal init.
These function will comes into during CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and !defined CONFIG_SPL_INIT_MINIMAL.

These function will be used for reading env variables.

Regards,
Prabhakar



_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to