Dear Robert Hodaszi, > Hi, > > Sorry, hopefully that will be a plain-text. > > There are a lot of bug announcement, just make a search: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33721
This was apparently fixed three years ago. > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16660 And this one six years ago ... > Also, I printed out the buffer addresses, and that temporary RX buffer > was not aligned. So the transmit function rounded it down to the > alignment boundary, and so caused invalid data transmission. (By the > way. Shouldn't the transmit function check whether the alignment is > proper, and throw an error message, instead of round it down? That would > make more sense.) Looking at the code one more time, it'd make most sense to simply allocate the buffer NOT on stack, but with some memalign-kind-of call to avoid this abuse of stack. You see, the max packet size is around 2k, which is quite a lot. How does this proposal sound to you ? Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
