Zynq lowlevel_init() was implemented in C but stack pointer is setup after function call in _main(). Move architecture setup to arch_cpu_init() which is call as the first function in board_init_f() which already have correct stack pointer.
Reported-by: Sven Schwermer <sven.schwer...@tuhh.de>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com>
---
I can't see any problem to call zynq setup a little
bit later. There is already expectation that u-boot
runs from DDR.
Moving lowlevel_init from C to ASM is possible but
I will have to introduce new macros with hardcoded
values. Using structures is much nicer.
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/cpu.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/cpu.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/cpu.c
index 4367d1a..8846f30 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/zynq/cpu.c
@@ -11,6 +11,10 @@
void lowlevel_init(void)
{
+}
+
+int arch_cpu_init(void)
+{
zynq_slcr_unlock();
/* remap DDR to zero, FILTERSTART */
writel(0, &scu_base->filter_start);
@@ -31,6 +35,8 @@ void lowlevel_init(void)
writel(0xC, &slcr_base->ddr_urgent);
zynq_slcr_lock();
+
+ return 0;
}
void reset_cpu(ulong addr)
--
1.8.2.3
pgpxrx4y3QdIg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
