On 08/21/2013 04:30 AM, tiger...@viatech.com.cn wrote:
Hi, experts:
Why not include cmd_fastboot.c in common directory in 2013.07 release
package?
Because of code license?
Or other reason?
Hi Tiger,
You bring up a question we're interested in as well.
It looks to me as if this died somewhere back in April of 2011
with this discussion:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-April/thread.html#90983
And a straw-man design document discussed here:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-April/thread.html/#091597
And a message about licensing in May of 2012:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-May/125304.html
Do we need a clean-room implementation in order to comply with?
Is anybody working either the licensing or implementation of this?
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
