On Monday 06 April 2009 03:56:39 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > > This seems to be a lot of effort, from code to command line pollution > > > - for what exactly? > > > > > > Which is the problem you are trying to solve? > > > > If I understood current u-boot debugging properly, the debug statements > > are enabled by editing src file by adding "#define DEBUG" > > Doing this the release contents will be tampered, > > This is just one way to solve this, which is most convenient when you > want to enable debugging on a per-file level. Of course you can > acchieve the same effect by just passing "-DDEBUG" as a compile > option. The Makefile allows to do this globally - there are currently > no fine-grained selections available by default.
i havent tested it, but i think this should get fine-grained flags in a flexible manner ? (the out of tree isnt exact, but you see what i'm after) -mike diff --git a/config.mk b/config.mk index b1254e9..8791caa 100644 --- a/config.mk +++ b/config.mk @@ -209,20 +209,20 @@ export TEXT_BASE PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS PLATFORM_RELFLAGS CPPFLAGS CFLAGS AFLAGS ifndef REMOTE_BUILD %.s: %.S - $(CPP) $(AFLAGS) -o $@ $< + $(CPP) $(AFLAGS) $(AFLAGS_$@) -o $@ $< %.o: %.S - $(CC) $(AFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< + $(CC) $(AFLAGS) $(AFLAGS_$@) -c -o $@ $< %.o: %.c - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS_$@) -c -o $@ $< else $(obj)%.s: %.S - $(CPP) $(AFLAGS) -o $@ $< + $(CPP) $(AFLAGS) $(AFLAGS_$@) -o $@ $< $(obj)%.o: %.S - $(CC) $(AFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< + $(CC) $(AFLAGS) $(AFLAGS_$@) -c -o $@ $< $(obj)%.o: %.c - $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(CFLAGS_$@) -c -o $@ $< endif #########################################################################
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
