On 07/30/2013 03:19 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org > <mailto:swar...@wwwdotorg.org>> wrote: ... > I think when init_sequence_f[] is running, there may be no serial > console to report errors. If so, moving the I2C initialization to that > early point sounds like a really bad idea. > > > Not really - when you see the U-Boot banner the console is working, and > we clearly see the U-Boot banner before i2c init happens.
I thought it got buffered up and only actually sent to the UART much later, and not in the case when something failed since U-Boot wouldn't get that far? Or, did that proposal get shot down? _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
