On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 04:06:27PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: [snip] > > No, because what we have today is insufficient for the kernel, you > > still have to specify the load/entry point, in FIT at least, even on > > NOLOAD. I'd have sworn at least, I couldn't find a way to get around > > this problem before... > > > > NOLOAD does work provided that the kernel in the FIT is a zImage. > Personally I think that is an odd thing to do, since U-Boot is perfectly > capable of decompressing a kernel, and the decompression shim requires ugly > hacks for caches and low-level serial access.
I haven't seen a .its with a NOLOAD kernel that doesn't specify a load/entry property for it. If you've got one, and it works on a Beaglebone (which doesn't have DDR starting at 0x0 ...), I'd love to see the .its :) -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
