On 07/17/2013 04:05:37 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/09/2013 02:00:06 PM, Justin Waters wrote:
Give the user the ability to disable NAND support by defining
CONFIG_NO_NAND. This will allow custom hardware to easily support
this configuration.
Signed-off-by: Justin Waters <justin.wat...@timesys.com>
---
include/configs/am335x_evm.h | 55
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/am335x_evm.h
b/include/configs/am335x_evm.h
index c5a6d4b..7bcfe2e 100644
--- a/include/configs/am335x_evm.h
+++ b/include/configs/am335x_evm.h
@@ -42,12 +42,39 @@
#define CONFIG_SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE 64
+#ifdef CONFIG_NO_NAND
+#undef CONFIG_NAND
+#else
+#define CONFIG_NAND
+#endif
Wouldn't it be cleaner to move CONFIG_NAND into boards.cfg, so if you
want NAND to be absent, you just add a similar target that doesn't
set it?
Especially if this is for custom hardware, which ought to get its own
board.cfg line.
Sigh, as soon as I sent this my mail client decided it would be a good
idea to show me the other replies from a couple days ago saying the
same thing. I need a new mail client...
-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
