Hi Vivek, [...]
> Very well said. I can see Dan's stack is nicely sync'ed with Linux > (with ifdef's ;-) which i am sure are going to vanish down the line) > I had a initial look at Dan's patches, which have backported DWC3 and > XHCI, but i am sure we are going to > need some amount of code to be put in usb core framework (common/usb*.c), > if we are going to enable complete xHCI (super speed) support. Absolutely, you have that part though ;-) > For DWC3, i leave it to you, as to how much code we want to pull in. > Ofcourse my driver for exynos did some basic DWC3 initialization, > making it hard for other vendors who are using DWC3 to resuse the code. Exynos also uses dwc3 ? > > What I'd like to see is Vivek's version merged into Dan's version, that > > should be easy (by the looks of it) and then this combined version > > merged mainline. This should hopefully retain the easy possibility to > > update the USB3 code from Linux. It should also cut down the time it > > will take to get Dan's code into working state (since that's done in > > Vivek's tree already). > > We can go ahead merging the two versions. But i do have few doubts > with how Dan is > structuring things. > Better i comment on his patches and clear my doubts. Thanks. > Dear Dan, > > Please suggest on how you are planning going ahead and merging the two > versions of xHCI stack. > > > Now you can flame me to death. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
