On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:45:46PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message <20130702162829.GG16630@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > That said, when others have suggested something like this before, > > Wolfgang has pointed out and NAK'd the idea of adding N different > > configuration as that adds (potentially) a lot of build time for > > custodians/etc that tend to build --soc or --arch or other group > > targets. So, what do we want to do here? I guess longer term, if we > > are able to focus on switching to Kconfig, it would become we provide a > > generic defconfig for am335x (or imx6 or ...) with a best-fit-for-all > > set and communities can provide tweaked binaries as needed. But do we > > want to think about any stop-gap solutions here? > > You can always add extra defines on the make command line...
OK, I'm not spotting the easy way to do that. Hint? Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
