On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 03:33:19PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Add a description of how to implement verified boot using signed FIT > > images, > > and a simple test which verifies operation on sandbox. > > > > The test signs a FIT image and verifies it, then signs a FIT configuration > > and verifies it. Then it corrupts the signature to check that this is > > detected. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > If it helps, here are the results of my build for this series (and the > trace one). No new failures but you can see quite a few problems with > Xscale.
I _think_ Xscale is toolchain choice related. My question is, for arches which use --gc-sections, what is the size change from before to after, when not opting in on this? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
