On Apr 2, 2009, at 4:03 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Thursday 02 April 2009, Detlev Zundel wrote: >>> I suggest to either remove this MSI_RI from the header again (it >>> doesn't >>> seem to be used here) or rename it. >> >> Ok, so much for the plan to add the defines not bit by bit as needed, >> but register-wise, while we're there. >> >> I actually would prefer to use UART_MSR_RI, as this is a UART thingy >> rather than to remove the define as we surely use the register, so I >> feel it worthwhile to have the whole definition on board. > > That's my preference as well.
Agreed, when I saw MSR_RI I wasn't thinking UART at all. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
