On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote: > Hallo Marek, > > On 17/06/2013 14:51, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> I am missing something: which is the real advantage to reduce the >>> console buffer ? I do not think that the saved memory is worth, and on >>> the other side more elaborated scripts (usings nested if-then-else) are >>> quite long nowadays. >> >> True, but so far they didn't overflow this limit I believe. Some of them are >> hanging on the verge of blowing it though, good point. > > I think that a point to consider is if all scripts are already provided > or we let the user/owner of the board to add his own scripts, as I > presume. It is pity if he cannot do what u-boot really supports only to > save some bytes.
I think this is more than enough to justify a bigger buffer. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://projetos.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
