On Jun 10, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > Hi, > > Request for few details here. > > I am not understanding why this is applied on tree, [even i din't see > the applied note on mailing list, may be i am missing]
I've been bad about sending a message when I apply the patches. I'm hesitant to do so when I apply dozens of patches at a time, as it adds significant overhead to each patch application. Finding the patch email in my inbox is time-consuming. > I was asked Xie Xiaobo to send v2 fo updating the name to > - .name = "S25FL129P_64K/S25FL128S", > + .name = "S25FL129P_64K/S25FL128S_64K", > > Even i sent a patch on be of Xie Xiaobo > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/247607/ > > Any comments, was the notion i used on patch was wrong. Sorry, York Sun submitted a version of the original patch back in March, and it got applied May 24. I see now that you got a version in February, which Xiaobo responded to May 30. I didn't realize it was under your domain, so I apologize (Ah, I see you were added to the list probably just after I looked for who was in charge of spi). Feel free to revert the patch, or modify, as you see fit, and I will avoid applying patches to spi in the future. :) Andy _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
