> -----Original Message----- > From: Angelo Dureghello [mailto:sysa...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 10:21 PM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Jin Zhengxiong-R64188 > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] patches never reviewed > > Dear Scott, > > please be sure before replying to verify the "history" of the threads. > This patch is around for more than one year. > > 1) i was quite sure that last patch body was ok. Please let me know > eventually what are these issues, if any, with a "feedback". > > 2) in most of the cases i always included Mr, Jason Jim in CC, that in > most of the cases never reply. Maybe could be the case to verify this and > clarify with him. > > 3) this "subject" is in this form because is not the 1st but the second > reminder to review the patches, and not a patch. > > You told me > board: add support for amcore board > is not correct, > > but of course you can check the patchwork site and see other title like > that "passed". And in case i fix this, someone will say the m68k in the > title is wrong, becouse is a board patch. > > To the community, > ---------------- > > i fixed several and several things on this patch over more than one year, > following several and several feedbacks from many of you. > > I was expecting a minimal of flexibility and a final approval, since i > contributed also for bug fixing sometime, and since some other boards has > been approved wthout too many troubles. > > I have seen this is depending much from the cpu/arch tree maintainer or > custodian. > And the custodian of Coldfire tree from Freescale seems is not > partecipating to much in this patch. > > The result is that there is no way to have the board nor m5307 cpu patch > accepted becouse again, for the 100th time, there is something not > correct. > > I am not stupid, and understanding now that whatever would be my changes, > patch will still be stopped and stopped from a different guy. > > I don't want to accuse anyone of any form of discrimination, but i stop > to contribute for now, almost for m68k branch.
[Jason Jin-R64188] I'm sorry for late response for this V6 version patches. But you really need to send the patch by git-send-email instead of by attachments, so everybody can review it in the mail. Please resend it. Thanks. > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 12:54:31PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > On 06/04/2013 12:47:47 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > >On 06/03/2013 03:51:48 PM, Angelo Dureghello wrote: > > >>Dear All, > > >> > > >>i worked hardly through v6 for approval of this AMCORE Coldfire > > >>board support. > > >> > > >>Waited patiently for review of this patches: > > >> > > >>http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/215904/ > > >>http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/214686/ > > >> > > >>then asked again later for the review: > > >> > > >>http://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=136059580219228&w=2 > > >> > > >>still, at today, i had no feedbacks. > > >> > > >>Unfortunately (i can be wrong) but i have the impression at freescale > > >>no-one have time to spend for following this board addition. > > > > > >Jason Jin is the Coldfire custodian. I've added him on CC here; > > >please be sure to put him on CC when you send Coldfire patches or > > >inquiries. > > > > Sigh, and of course the list ate the CC. So for all I know maybe > > you had him on CC to begin with... > > > > Another thing that can help is using better subject lines. "patches > > review" isn't going to let people know what sort of patches they are > > and if it's their responsibility or not. Likewise, "board: add > > support for amcore board" doesn't have m68k or coldfire in the title > > (whereas "board:" is redundant). > > > > -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
