Hi,
Thanks for your response.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Rajeshwari Birje
<rajeshwari.bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> Hope following reply answer your query.
>
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any update on this, is this a different part w.r.t what I refer for?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jagan.
>>
>> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Rajeshwari,
>>>
>>> + {
>>> + .id = 0x5014,
>>>
>>> is this id code is correct? it seems like 0x4014
> When you see the datasheet of W25Q80BW page 16, the table says its 5014h
>>>
>>> + .nr_blocks = 128,
>>>
>>> nr_blocks must be 16 i think?
> We use W25Q80BW which is 8MB, hence it is correct as per following
> calculation;
> flash->size = 4096 * 16 * params->nr_blocks;
Yes, it is 8M-BIT so the nr_blocks should be 16 to calculate the flash
size as 1Mbyte.
--
Thanks,
Jagan.
>>>
>>> + .name = "W25Q80",
>>> + },
>>> };
>>>
>>> Honestly the commit message itself is wrong, i guess.
> Yes this I agree is my fault, but wonder how it went in through all the
> reviews.
>>>
>>> Please comment.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jagan.
>> _______________________________________________
>> U-Boot mailing list
>> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rajeshwari Shinde
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
