On 04/28/2013 01:17:34 AM, Haijun.Zhang wrote:
From: "Haijun.Zhang" <[email protected]>
Add platform support for p1020rdb-pd
Explain what is different about "-pd" and why this new revision
requires a separate compile-time target.
If it's due to raw DDR config, say so in the changelog. Is there any
way we could read a revision register to select the proper DDR config
at runtime?
If it's due to different NAND page size, that will no longer be an
issue once this is applied:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/223436/
+#if (defined(CONFIG_P1020RDB) || defined(CONFIG_P1020RDB_PD))
#if defined(CONFIG_P1020RDB)
#define CONFIG_BOARDNAME "P1020RDB-PC"
+#elif defined(CONFIG_P1020RDB_PD)
+#define CONFIG_BOARDNAME "P1020RDB-PD"
+#endif
CONFIG_P1020RDB is not a good name to mean specifically the -PC
revision. Change it so that CONFIG_P1020RDB is set for all revisions
of P1020RDB, and introduce CONFIG_P1020RDB-PC for PC-specific things.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
