On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Lubomir Popov <lpo...@mm-sol.com> wrote: > Well, I needed it when bringing up the board ;) - to validate the > supplies, clocks, etc. Right, this function should be embraced within a > #ifdef CONFIG_PALSMAS_AUDPWR and not compile in the general case (my code > calling it is #ifdef-ed anyway). Right, and you need u-boot modified to do validation? I think either such code should stay out of tree, or be validated by expicit i2c commands (which already is supported) OR tested by virtual regulator consumer in linux ;)
I dont think we should make u-boot an OS. just my 2 cents. my rule of thumb is: if it is not needed for boot, do it elsewhere other than bootloader. Regards, NM _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
