Dear Fabio Estevam,
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
> > Uh, why is it even set ? Does the bootrom screw up with it? But then it's
> > cool, just fix those few remaining ramblings of mine and stick my Acks
> > on it.
>
> Ok, let's go step by step.
>
> mx23 reference manual says that EMI pins voltage bits can be:
> 0 - for normal operation
> 1 - invalid.
>
> After reset this bit is 1 and the iomux driver needs to clear this bit.
>
> Let's look at the defines:
>
> #define MXS_PAD_1V8 ((PAD_1V8 << MXS_PAD_VOL_SHIFT) | \
> MXS_PAD_VOL_VALID_MASK)
> #define MXS_PAD_3V3 ((PAD_3V3 << MXS_PAD_VOL_SHIFT) | \
> MXS_PAD_VOL_VALID_MASK)
>
> and then in the iomux;c driver:
>
> if (PAD_VOL_VALID(pad)) {
> bp = PAD_PIN(pad) % 8 * 4 + 2;
> mxs_reg = (struct mxs_register_32 *)(iomux_base + ofs);
> if (PAD_VOL(pad))
> writel(1 << bp, &mxs_reg->reg_set);
> else
> writel(1 << bp, &mxs_reg->reg_clr);
> }
>
> So the only way that the iomux driver can clear the voltage bit is if
> PAD_VOL_VALID(pad) is true, and the only way that PAD_VOL_VALID(pad)
> can be true is if either MXS_PAD_3V3 or MXS_PAD_1V8 are defined, since
> they have the MXS_PAD_VOL_VALID_MASK bit in their definitions.
Yuck. But then, why not configure the pins as 1V8 ? But either way WFM.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
