Hello Albert, on 09.04.2013 14:42, wrote Albert ARIBAUD: > Hi Heiko, > > On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:11:38 +0200, Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> wrote: > >>> Let us assume I keep 12K. Here is a current build of cam_enc_4xx: >>> >>> text data bss dec hex filename >>> 439526 13148 311092 763766 ba776 ./u-boot >>> 9073 840 500 10413 28ad ./spl/u-boot-spl [...] >>> Would that be ok? >> >> Yes, that seems good to me, but I could not test it ... > > I can do a diff of the binaries with and without the patch -- > normally, they should be the same except for the U-Boot version > identification. Would that do?
Yes. I did this too, and see only a diff for the version string. (But not forget to commit your change first, else the "-dirty" in the version string will insert an offset ;-) bye, Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
