On 18:52-20130404, Lubomir Popov wrote:
> V2 fixes line wrap issue of the patch itself.
>
> Need to add these base addresses in order to use I2C4 and I2C5.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Popov <lpo...@mm-sol.com>
>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap5/cpu.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap5/cpu.h
> b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap5/cpu.h
> index 5e62013..044ab55 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap5/cpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap5/cpu.h
> @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ struct watchdog {
> #define I2C_BASE1 (OMAP54XX_L4_PER_BASE + 0x70000)
> #define I2C_BASE2 (OMAP54XX_L4_PER_BASE + 0x72000)
> #define I2C_BASE3 (OMAP54XX_L4_PER_BASE + 0x60000)
> +#define I2C_BASE4 (OMAP54XX_L4_PER_BASE + 0x7A000)
> +#define I2C_BASE5 (OMAP54XX_L4_PER_BASE + 0x7C000)
and used where.
Also could you repost the patches generated with
git format-patch -M -o someplace --cover-letter master..
so that the patches are numbered in the order that needs to be reviewed.
in general, if you introduce an macro, you need to use the macro in the
same patch. So, it seems to me that a few of your patches are supposed
to be squashed into a single one which enables i2c5 for omap5 as an
single patch.
>
> /* MUSB base */
> #define MUSB_BASE (OMAP54XX_L4_CORE_BASE + 0xAB000)
> --
> 1.7.9.5
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
