On 03/30/2013 03:30 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > +U-Boot > > Hi Allen, York, > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Allen Martin <amar...@nvidia.com > <mailto:amar...@nvidia.com>> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:56:33AM -0700, York Sun wrote: > > On 03/29/2013 10:52 AM, Allen Martin wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:49:06AM -0700, York Sun wrote: > > >> On 03/29/2013 10:29 AM, Allen Martin wrote: > > >>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 09:56:41AM -0700, York Sun wrote: > > >>>> On 03/27/2013 12:55 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > >>>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:38:37PM -0700, York Sun wrote: > > >>>>>> On 03/21/2013 01:28 PM, Allen Martin wrote: > > >>>>> [snip] > > >>>>>>> PS: What happened with your bool fixup patch? I'm a big > fan of that > > >>>>>>> patch :^) > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Tom asked on March 4th. I think he will accept it. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I never got the expected acks on v7 that I thought would be > forthcoming. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Allen, > > >>>> > > >>>> Can you ack the v7 of the bool fixup patch? Tom seems waiting > for you. > > >>> > > >>> Oh sorry, I didn't realize there was a newer version of the > patch I > > >>> hadn't ack'ed yet. I'll take a look today. Do you know if it > still > > >>> applies cleanly to TOT u-boot/master, or will it need to be > rebased? > > >>> > > >> > > >> It almost applies cleanly. > > >> > > >> Checking patch board/xilinx/common/xbasic_types.h... > > >> error: board/xilinx/common/xbasic_types.h: does not exist in index > > >> > > >> due to commit > > >> > > >> commit 151eeeb2754da4b2d26bb878206d45ce58276fe0 > > >> Author: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com > <mailto:michal.si...@xilinx.com>> > > >> Date: Wed Jan 23 14:11:50 2013 +0100 > > >> > > >> board: xilinx: Remove common folder > > >> > > >> All these files was used for ancient xilinx drivers > > >> which are finally gone. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com > <mailto:michal.si...@xilinx.com>> > > >> Tested-by: Rommel Custodio <sessya...@gmail.com > <mailto:sessya...@gmail.com>> > > >> > > >> board/xilinx/common/xbasic_types.c | 165 ---- > > >> board/xilinx/common/xbasic_types.h | 283 ------ > > >> board/xilinx/common/xbuf_descriptor.h | 252 ------ > > >> board/xilinx/common/xdma_channel.c | 738 ---------------- > > >> board/xilinx/common/xdma_channel.h | 291 ------ > > >> board/xilinx/common/xdma_channel_i.h | 110 --- > > >> board/xilinx/common/xdma_channel_sg.c | 1317 > > >> ---------------------------- > > >> board/xilinx/common/xio.h | 81 -- > > >> board/xilinx/common/xipif_v1_23_b.c | 331 ------- > > >> board/xilinx/common/xipif_v1_23_b.h | 746 ---------------- > > >> board/xilinx/common/xpacket_fifo_v1_00_b.c | 448 ---------- > > >> board/xilinx/common/xpacket_fifo_v1_00_b.h | 306 ------- > > >> board/xilinx/common/xstatus.h | 347 -------- > > >> board/xilinx/common/xversion.c | 350 -------- > > >> board/xilinx/common/xversion.h | 97 -- > > >> board/xilinx/zynq/Makefile | 3 - > > >> 16 files changed, 5865 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> > > >> Do I need to send a newer version? > > >> > > > > > > Tom will probably make you send a newer one anyway. I'll fix it up > > > locally and start testing in the mean time. > > > > > > > Allen, > > > > I didn't change anything for the version, only removed "RFC" from the > > subject. I have been there for quite a while. I thought Tom was > going to > > pick it up. > > Yeah sorry, I would have re-acked it if I saw there was a new > version. Since it no longer applies cleanly I'm pretty sure he'll ask > you to send a new version that does even if there are no other > differences. > > Maybe we can talk Simon Glass into testing it out with his super fast > multi-arch u-boot builder. It's way fancier than the perl script I > use. Adding Simon. > > The patch in question is: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/217088/ > > > Yes, it needs a rebase, but the change is minor - I hope we can get this > in. York can you do a rebase? > > Here are the boards that seem to fail: EVB64260 ZUMA EVB64260_750CX P3G4 >
Thanks, Simon. I will rebase the patch and address those failure. York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
