From: Che-Liang Chiou <clch...@chromium.org>
timer_get_us returns the time in microseconds since a certain reference
point of history. However, it does not guarantee to return an accurate
time after a long period; instead, it wraps around (that is, the
reference point is reset to some other point of history) after some
periods. The frequency of wrapping around is about an hour (or 2^32
microseconds).
Test with command "sf probe 1:0; time sf read 40008000 0 1000".
Try with different numbers of bytes and see that sane values are obtained
Signed-off-by: Che-Liang Chiou <clch...@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <aksha...@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
---
Changes since v2:
- None.
Changes since v1:
- Added "Acked-by: Simon Glass".
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c
b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c
index c48a297..de61405 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c
@@ -90,6 +90,21 @@ unsigned long get_timer(unsigned long base)
return gd->arch.timer_reset_value / 1000 - base;
}
+unsigned long timer_get_us(void)
+{
+ static unsigned long base_time_us;
+
+ struct s5p_timer *const timer =
+ (struct s5p_timer *)samsung_get_base_timer();
+ unsigned long now_downward_us = readl(&timer->tcnto4);
+
+ if (!base_time_us)
+ base_time_us = now_downward_us;
+
+ /* Note that this timer counts downward. */
+ return base_time_us - now_downward_us;
+}
+
/* delay x useconds */
void __udelay(unsigned long usec)
{
--
1.8.0
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
