Hi Tom, On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:16:23PM +0100, Andreas Bie?mann wrote: >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>> On 03/13/2013 04:52 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >> This series creates a generic board init implementation which contains >>> >> the essential functions of the major arch/xxx/lib/board.c files. It is >>> >> split into two parts: board_f.c for pre-relocation and board_r.c for >>> >> post-relocation. >>> >>> I tested the whole series on avr32. The minor changes there do not break >>> runtime behaviour, therefore >>> >>> Tested-by: Andreas Bie?mann <andreas.biessm...@googlemail.com> >>> >>> Will this series be applied for upcomming release? I'm asking cause of >> >> Seeing as there's Wolfgang's tested/ack yes, this is quite likely to go >> in. Need to review it all again myself to be sure. Simon, can you >> please make a patchwork bundle out of it as well so I can be sure all of >> the patches are updated right (ie we have the old ones cleared out >> and the new ones assigned to me). Thanks! > > I found that one patch (2/31) needed a rev due to a recent change. I > resent this so it should hit patchwork soon. > > I did create a bundle but things were in the wrong order, so I will > try again when that happens. > > In the meantime there is a tree at u-boot-x86.git branch us-board-v11, > and I can do a pull request if you like.
Please see the patchwork bundle here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/sjg/us-board/ I had to rebase one of the patches and resend to the mailing this. But I just tried this bundle and it applied cleanly to master for me. Regards, Simon > > Regards, > Simon > >> >> -- >> Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
