Hi Wolfgang, On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Fabio Estevam, > > In message <1363228354-29534-1-git-send-email-feste...@gmail.com> you wrote: >> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com> >> >> Add initial support for Wandboard. > > Subject and commit message are redundant, resulting in text like this: > > Add initial support for Wandboard dual lite and solo. > > Add initial support for Wandboard. > > Please remove the second line.
Thanks for the review. I will address your comments and send v5 after the nitrogen patches are applied into u-boot.imx. >> +#define CONFIG_BOOTDELAY 1 > > Is there any reason for not chosing the more standard 5 second delay? Ok, so let's go with 3 seconds then ;-) > I can confirm that the code boots on a wanboard_dl system, but it does > not find the environment as used by the original Technixion port. Is > this intentional? To be honest I haven't really checked the environment settings used in the original Technixion port. Hopefully this is not a problem. > Can we please remove the "Reset cause: WDOG" line in production mode? Do you mean the change below? --- a/arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c +++ b/arch/arm/imx-common/cpu.c @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ int print_cpuinfo(void) (cpurev & 0x000F0) >> 4, (cpurev & 0x0000F) >> 0, mxc_get_clock(MXC_ARM_CLK) / 1000000); - printf("Reset cause: %s\n", get_reset_cause()); + debug("Reset cause: %s\n", get_reset_cause()); return 0; } #endif Since this is common code I can address it separately with other patch. Just let me know if this is OK. Regards, Fabio Estevam _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot