Dear Grant Likely, In message <fa686aa40903222000l13369f61gf93b26b4c804e...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > Even better, since this is entirely a busywait, the udelay(1) could be > dropped entirely and the exit condition be based on the value of > timebase. That would give the absolute maximum resolution to the > busyloop. However, the incremental improvement probably isn't a great > deal better than this patch.
I disagree. Keep in mind that on systems with hardware watchdog enabled udelay() implicitly takes care of triggering the watchdog, so using it in busy-wait loops is always a good idea. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Build a system that even a fool can use and only a fool will want to use it. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
