Hi Kim,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Kim Phillips
<kim.phill...@freescale.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:40:38 -0700
> Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kim,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Kim Phillips
>> <kim.phill...@freescale.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:53:37 -0700
>> > Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Kim Phillips
>> >> <kim.phill...@freescale.com>wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 19:11:16 -0800
>> >> > Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >> > > OK so let's look at adding the hash_register() idea. But not in this
>> >> > > series. That should come later in a revision of the hash.c
>> >> > > infrastructure, since it needs to adjust sha1, sha255 and crc32.
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't understand: why not s/ace/hw/g in common/ and include/ on
>> >> > this patchseries, then move straight to the device model at some
>> >> > later point? It's a compromise, but it works fine for the time
>> >> > being - other vendors can add their hash support without having to
>> >> > touch common code, code size is not affected, etc.
>> >>
>> >> Fine with me. The effect is the same - this is just a rename. Should not
>> >> be
>> >> done in the ace.h file though, only in the naming of the functions called
>> >> from hash.c, right?
>> >
>> > the ace_sha_hash_digest() declaration should be removed from
>> > ace_sha.h (it's only needed by the driver, which is ok without it
>> > being there). ACE_SHA_TYPE_SHA* definitions belong in the driver
>> > too - they're ACE h/w-specific. Rename the filename ace_sha.h to
>> > hw_sha.h, and all remaining ACE references contained in it.
>>
>> Maybe I misunderstand - are you saying that that all the ACE symbols
>> in the driver should be renamed to hw? That doesn't make a lot of
>> sense to me - why is this needed?
>
> no, only the entry points to the driver should be renamed - they are
> currently called ace_sha{1,256}(). The include/ace_sha.h file as it
> is currently can be made completely h/w agnostic.
OK, that sounds better.
Regards,
Simon
>
> Kim
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
