Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 10:56 -0700 schrieb Tom Warren: > Lucas, > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Lucas Stach <d...@lynxeye.de> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > Am Montag, den 11.02.2013, 10:17 -0700 schrieb Tom Warren: > >> Linux dts files were used for those boards that didn't already > >> have sdhci info populated. Tamonten has their own dtsi file with > >> common sdhci nodes (sourced from Linux). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twar...@nvidia.com> > >> --- > >> v2: > >> - cleanup comments in dts files/match w/kernel files > >> - add sdhci aliases in all dts files > >> - use tegra20-tamonten.dtsi from the kernel for AD boards > >> > >> arch/arm/dts/tegra20-tamonten.dtsi | 489 > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > I'm not sure if pushing the whole file in this patch is the right thing > > to do. > > I didn't want to edit it since we seem to be moving towards using the > Linux DTS files in toto in U-Boot (as per Stephen & Simon). Does it do > any harm to have the whole thing here? Saves some work later. Thierry > - what do you think? > I'm not objecting against pulling in the kernel dtsi in general, as I think most of the things in there like pinmux will become handy in a bit. I would just like to see this huge chunk in a separate patch and this one would then just add the aliases.
Regards, Lucas _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
