On 24/01/2013 19:34, Marek Vasut wrote: >> That's also an option ... do you want subsequent patch or respin of the >> series? > > Actually, check how it's distributed: > > $ git grep mxsmmc_initialize board | sed "s@.*/@@" > apx4devkit.c: return mxsmmc_initialize(bis, 0, NULL, NULL); > m28evk.c: return mxsmmc_initialize(bis, 0, m28_mmc_wp, NULL); > mx28evk.c: return mxsmmc_initialize(bis, 0, mx28evk_mmc_wp, NULL); > mx23_olinuxino.c: return mxsmmc_initialize(bis, 0, NULL, > mx23_olx_mmc_cd); > sc_sps_1.c: return mxsmmc_initialize(bis, 0, NULL, NULL); > > We have quite a bit of variance there. I wonder if using cpu_mmc_init() is > worth > it.
I see. Ok, then let's the things as they are. Regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
