Hello ksi, k...@koi8.net wrote: [...] > Eh, I did offer such a model for I2C :) And that model can be extended to > anything else. That is what I'm actually implementing for my new board. But > that goes into $(BOARD)/* because I simply don't have time for pushing it > into the U-Boot proper. I wasted 2+ weeks for I2C without any result (that >
You wasted? You told us you get money for it ... We didn;t, so what would we say? BTW: I have ready 2 new branches in the I2C git. One with exactly your patches, and one with the suggestions by wolfgang and me. I think, when v2009.03 is released I can make them public, and we can discuss them objective (because we have now 2 versions which we can compare, so no arguments must come from the sky ;-) again ... > is not counting another couple of weeks I spent on that before starting > sending patches to the list.) > When you want to get this in mainline, maybe next time you first ask before spending "couple of weeks" for it? bye Heiko -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
