On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:00:39 +0100 Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> wrote:
> > so instead of naming it "i2c_bus_num_mux" it should be renamed > > "i2c_adapter_num"?, or does i2c_get_bus_num() still imply that it will > > No, i2c_adapter_num should be 0 or 1 for Controller 0 or 1, I think, > and i2c_bus_num_mux can be greater then 1. > > If we would do a rename, we should rename "i2c_bus_num" to "i2c_adapter_num". > In case, we don;t use i2c mux, i2c_bus_num = i2c_adapter_num. > else i2c_bus_num >= i2c_adapter_num (=0 or 1) sigh..that's not really that better either. > > altogether? > > We should rework this "i2c multibus" instead complete, so we can remove > all this instances from i2c_get_bus_num()/i2c_set_bus_num() in every > i2c driver ... such an attempt was in discussion, but unfortunately > failed ... but I hope I can retrigger it. ok - looking forward to it. Thanks, Kim _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
