On 13:02 Tue 27 Jan , Detlev Zundel wrote: > Hi Jean-Christophe, > > >> > > Note that there are other places where this is used - these must be > >> > > changed, too - for example: > >> > > > >> > > "board/lpc2292sodimm/lpc2292sodimm.c": > >> > > > >> > > 42 /* arch number MACH_TYPE_ARMADILLO - not official*/ > >> > > 43 gd->bd->bi_arch_number = 83; > >> > I've not find it in the official list so I've let as 83 (non registered > >> > board) > >> > >> You canged the old "MACH_TYPE_ARMADILLO" / 83 setting in one place but > >> not in others? This will cause inconsistent behaviour. > >> > >> You must not do that. Either leave ALL of these as they are, or fix > >> ALL of them in the SAME way. > > the other board are not a ARMODILLO correct if I wrong > > Why not correct the wrong comment? I think this is the consistent thing > to do, as there certainly is no definition for "83" in the kernel and 83 > has nothing to do with ARMADILLO. This make sense anyway normaly no new arm board will not have a valid machine id now
Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
