On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:29:03 -0800 (PST) Ron Madrid <ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> --- On Fri, 1/23/09, Kim Phillips <kim.phill...@freescale.com> wrote: > > > From: Kim Phillips <kim.phill...@freescale.com> > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpc83xx: New board support for SIMPC8313 > > To: "Ron Madrid" <ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net> > > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 12:36 PM > > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:05:24 -0800 > > Ron Madrid <ron_mad...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > > +ENTRY(_start) > > > +ASSERT(_end <= 0xfff01000, "NAND bootstrap > > too big"); > > > > Ron, the above gets asserted when building for large page > > nand with a > > gcc 4.1.2 based toolchain: > > Please forgive my ignorance, but how can I go about fixing this? How do I > determine my toolchain and how can I use the same one you are referring to? > Are there any documents that can point me in the right direction? I'm just using what Fedora brought to me on my G5 box (native compiler). I still use it because it's close to what the ELDK version is (or used to be - I can't immediately tell which version the ELDK is using right now). Where/when did you get your toolchain? > Also, this seems strange that they should have different sizes when being > built as they have always been identical sizes for my builds. But I'll > determine the reason for this soon. this is true; if it helps, I tried playing with the LP's PAD_TO value to no avail... Kim _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
