Wolkgang Denk sez, > Jens Scharsig claims,
>> I think my patch only don't work on AT91RM9200DK, >> AT91RM9200EK or AT91RM9200DF board. Blame it on this >> solution is the #ifdef construct in /cpu/arm920t/start.s >> at line 264. There are no low_level_init run for DK, >> EK andDF board. > I agree. That code looks pretty bogus to me, too. I've had the problem where trying to run u-boot directly from rom fails, and read various bits about the defines in start.s being goofed. > I can confirm that removing the "defined(CONFIG_AT91RM9200DK) ||" > part there makes the code work on the AT91RM9200DK board (j24: > patch following ASAP). > > Any AT91RM9200EK and AT91RM9200DF users out there to test > this? I'll be happy to do that, I have an AT91RM9200-EK board that I'm doing dev on right now. I assume that I can download the current tree and get the patched version? Matt --- Beating my head against the AT91RM9200 for too long. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
