Dear Kumar Gala, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > --- a/lib_generic/strmhz.c > > +++ b/lib_generic/strmhz.c > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ char *strmhz (char *buf, long hz) > > long l, n; > > long m; > > > > - n = DIV_ROUND(hz, 1000000L); > > + n = DIV_ROUND(hz, 1000) / 1000L; > > l = sprintf (buf, "%ld", n); > > > > hz -= n * 1000000L; > > -- > > 1.5.5.1 > > I haven't been following this thread, but can we control the number of > significant digits. I'm starting to see output like: > > Clock Configuration: > CPU:1500.4294967282 MHz, CCB:600.4294967291 MHz, > DDR:400.4294967293 MHz (800.4294967289 MT/s data rate) > (Asynchronous), LBC:37.500 MHz > > (it use to look like) > > Clock Configuration: > CPU:1500 MHz, CCB: 600 MHz, > DDR: 401 MHz (801 MT/s data rate) (Asynchronous), LBC: 37 MHz
Can you please provide the input to the strmhz() function (the "hz" parameter) that is causing such output? I am aware that we will have a problem when "hz" exceeds the 2.147 GHz limit (as that's the limit for a "long" data type), but that's another problem, and requires many changes. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough. - Niels Bohr _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
