Dear Leon, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > * Intermediate releases, that might become necessary because of > > serious bugs or other major problems, shall be indicated by > > incrementing the "SUBLEVEL" field. > > ... > From experience with other open-source projects: > > I would remove this level, and use the third level for stable branch > bugfixes releases instead.
This was my original intention, too. But there were a couple of people asking for ways to do hot fix releases if things were terribly broken. > It is very unlikely to release feature-upgrade releases within one month/ Not feature upgrades; urgent bug fixes. Frankly, I don't think that we need more than the regular, plain releases. But some of us are customer-driven, so both stable trees and bug fix releases may become necessary, and the suggested scheme allows for both. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Q: What do you get when you cross an ethernet with an income statement? A: A local area networth. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot