On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:18:53 +0900 "Kyungmin Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Josh, > > First thank you for announcing UBI support on U-boot. > > Actually the Samsung implemented the UBI support on U-boot already and > has used it internally. The big difference is the code base. It's > based on kernel UBI code. Yes it's not fit well to u-boot ecosystem so > it created the ubi wrapper for u-boot. Interesting. > I saw your source codes and ubi commands. I think it supports minimal > features of UBI, no volume create, remove, read/write and so on like > these. That is correct. Simple scan and static volume read support are present in the code base I pushed out. That was all the project we were doing really required in U-Boot at the time. > u-boot $ help ubi > ubi info [l[ayout]] - Display volume and ubi layout information > ubi create[vol] volume [size] [type] - create volume name with size > ubi write[vol] address volume size - Write volume from address with size > ubi read[vol] address volume [size] - Read volume to address with size > ubi remove[vol] volume - Remove volume > [Legends] > volume: character name > size: KiB, MiB, GiB, and bytes > type: s[tatic] or d[ynamic] (default=dynamic) > > I want to know what's the better way if there are two code bases. > > Please give any options and comments If your code base is more feature complete, it is certainly worth looking at. Particularly if it is for a newer version of U-Boot. josh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
