[ The Types Forum (announcements only),
     http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-announce ]

Dear all,

I have a fully funded 3.5-year PhD position in logic and category theory 
available at the Department of Informatics of the University of Sussex, UK. 
Below is a possible project proposal, however I'm open to discussion and I'd be 
very happy to adapt it to any candidate with a strong interest in logic and 
category theory, as well as to consider self-proposed projects in these areas.

The position comes with tax-free stipend at a standard rate of £18,662 per year 
and fees will be waived (at the UK, EU, or international rate) for 3.5 years. 
In addition, the student will have available a one-off Research and Training 
Support Grant of £2,000. 

The student will join the Foundations of Software System group at Sussex, which 
is fast growing (three new lecturers are joining us this academic year) and 
comprises researchers in logic, type theory, semantics of programming 
languages, formal verification, quantum theory, term rewriting, category 
theory, and network systems. The university campus is not far from the city of 
Brighton, with excellent quality of life (it's by the sea) and direct 
connections to Gatwick Airport and London. 
For any information about the position and how to apply, please email me at 
mailto:[email protected]. 

With kind regards,
Alessio Santamaria

---
Proposed project title: Categorical semantics of Deep Inference formalisms.

Deep Inference is a methodology for designing formal proof systems that 
generalise Gentzen's formalisms of sequent calculus and natural deduction. In a 
Deep Inference formalism one is allowed to apply logical rules to connectives 
that are arbitrarily deep inside a formula, instead of just the main 
connective, hence the name "deep inference". From this simple concept stem 
several consequences, here are a few:

1. Proofs can be composed using the same connectives that build up the formulae.
2. Structural rules can be reduced, without loss of information, to an atomic 
form.
3. We can extract from a proof a graph, called "atomic flow", which discards 
the connectives and only keeps track of the atoms, from their creation to their 
destruction.

The compositional nature of deep inference proofs makes category theory a 
natural setting for an algebraic semantics of these proofs. In particular, 
atomic flows are reminiscent of string diagrams for monoidal categories. 
Another operation for deep inference proofs that is being currently developed 
is substitution of proofs into others, as a generalisation of the usual notion 
of substitution of a formula inside the atom occurrences of another. From the 
categorical point of view, in very simple cases, this looks like horizontal 
composition of natural and extranatural transformations. For more details about 
deep inference, see 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://alessio.guglielmi.name/res/cos/__;!!IBzWLUs!UmBnnxaGD1UiK9Pyto-HC6bUZ4yTcfbNodk2KIR0jPHvxGHB6pIRxn0gDu302nC-TbDzBaHQTtd6sNWNYvZ1tTqp59PvHu3FBO7BVjMsQg$
  .
This project aims to giving a precise, sound and complete categorical semantics 
to deep inference formalisms of various logics with substitution. The PhD 
student will need to have a 2:1 degree or equivalent in Computer Science or 
Mathematics and a strong interest in logic and/or category theory.


Reply via email to